Revert does not mean reply. Why can't people use "reply" when they mean reply? Are they trying to sound pompous? I certainly hope not. English, while allowing for variation of meanings, certainly should refrain from redundancy. Mean what you say, and say what you mean.
From Merriam-Webster:
Main Entry: re·vert
Pronunciation: \ri-ˈvərt\
Function: intransitive verb
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French revertir, from Latin revertere, v.t., to turn back & reverti, v.i., to return, come back, from re- + vertere, verti to turn — more atworth
Date: 15th century
1 : to come or go back (as to a former condition, period, or subject)
2 : to return to the proprietor or his or her heirs at the end of a reversion
3 : to return to an ancestral type
From OED:
verb
1 [no object] (revert to) return to (a previous state , practice, topic, etc.):he reverted to his native languagehe ignored her words by reverting to the former subject
Biologyreturn to (a former or ancestral type):it is impossible that a fishlike mammal will actually revert to being a true fish
Law(of property) return to (the original owner) by reversion
2 [with object] archaicturn (one's eyes or steps) back:on reverting our eyes, every step presented some new and admirable scene
From Longman:
revert to somebody/something
phrasal verb1 to change back to a situation that existed in the past [= go back to]:
The city reverted to its former name of St Petersburg.
After a few weeks, everything reverted to normal.
2 formal to return to an earlier subject of conversation [= go back to]:
To revert to the question of exams, I'd like to explain further.
3 law if land or a building reverts to its former owner, it becomes their property again
1 comment:
What's the purpose of posting these definitions?
Post a Comment